Under
Construction
Research into the effects of radio frequency radiation (RFR)
has been conducted for decades - ever since the development
and deployment of radar by the military. Even early radar operators
showed suspicious health effects from their occupational exposure.
Much of the research conducted by the military has not been
made known to the public. |
|
May 12, 2003 - These two new articles by EMF researcher W. Ross
Adey, M.D. will be published in an upcoming issue of The Internal
Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Third Volume, B. Smith and G.
Adelman, editors.
March
2003 Fact Sheet entitled, "Studies
on Radiofrequency Radiation Emitted by Cellular Phones," from
the National Toxicology Program/National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences (NTP/NIEHS). The NTP is in the design phase of a
number of studies to be conducted on Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR);
this fact sheet describes the status of NTP research efforts.
In recent years with the proliferation
of the wireless telecommunications industry and personal wireless
devices (cell phones, digital phone, pagers, etc.) consumers have
begun to demand answers to questions about their own exposures.
We make available here comprehensive summaries of the research in
this field.
1. Elsevier's French journal
entitled Pathologie Biologie has published the study by Roger
Santini et al. on the health of people living near mobile phone
base stations. It is the first published study looking at exposures
from mobile phone base station antennas. This is the English translation
of the complete study: "Study
of the health of people living in the vicinity of mobile phone base
stations: I. Influences of distance and sex."
A
bibliography from Professor Roger Santini, researcher at the NationaI
Institute of Applied Science in Lyon, France: " PUBLICATIONS
ABOUT THE HEALTH OF PEOPLE LIVING IN VICINITY OF CELLULAR PHONE
BASE STATIONS." He has compiled this list to counter assertions
that no studies exist on this subject., that base station antenna
radiation is too weak to affect those living near them, or that
studies on this subject are impossible to carry out.
2. See also the English translation
of Professor Santini's testimony presented on March 6, 2002, to
the French Parliamentary Office for Evaluation of Scientific and
Technology Alternatives. He testified at the request of Senators
Jean-Louis Lorrain and Daniel Raoul. The presentation is entitled,
"Arguments
in Favor of Applying the Precautionary Principle to Counter the
Effects of Mobile Phone Base Stations."
3. This is the statement on
the state of the science by the participants at the
Vienna Conference.
4. Dr. Henry Lai,
Ph.D., lead research for several decades at the Bioelectromagnetics
Research Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, Washington. He presented this paper at: The
IBC-UK Conference: "Mobile Phones-Is there a Health Risk?" September
16-17, 1997 in Brussels, Belgium. (This is a PDF document.)
Neurological
Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Relating to
Wireless Communication Technology
5. Dr. Henry Lai
presented this paper at the 1998 Vienna Conference: the "Workshop
on Possible Biological and Health Effects of RF Electromagnetic
Fields", Mobile Phone and Health Symposium, Oct 25-28, 1998, University
of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. (This is a PDF document.)
Neurological
Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation
6. Dr. Henry Lai
presented this paper at the 1999 World Health Organization (WHO)
conference:
"The Biological Effects, Health Consequences and Standards for Pulsed
Radiofrequency Field", an international seminar sponsored by the
International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection and
World Health Organization, at the Ettoll Majorare, Centre for Scientific
Culture, Erice, Sicily, Italy, November 21-25, 1999. (This is a
PDF document.)
Memory
and Behavior
7. Dr. Henry Lai's
most recent summary of current research. This includes studies funded
by industry and non-industry sources. 80% of these studies demonstrate
some kind of biological effect.(This is a large PDF document.)
Recent
studies (1995-2000) on the biological effects of radiofrequency
and cell phone radiation
8. NeuroReport
-
Exposure to pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic field during waking
affects human sleep EEG: NeuroReport Volume 11, number
15, 3321-3325.
The aim of the study was to investigate whether the electromagnetic
field emitted by digital radiotelephone handsets affects brain physiology.
The main effect was the enhancement of the intensity of certain
frequencies of the brain's electrical signals (i.e. electroencephalogram,
EEG) in the first 30 minutes of non-REM sleep.
9. Environment
Contaminated by Microwaves - Dr. Wolfgang Volkrodt: "Our environment
is contaminated by microwaves. At present, the consequences are
largely unexplored; however, observations of trees offer dire foreboding."
The following
pdf files offer an introduction and selection of Dr. Volkrodt's
research and supporting documents:

The extensive
use of mobile phones has given rise to public debate about possible
adverse effects on human health. A recent report of the Independent
Expert Group on Mobile Phones established by the British government
summarized the relevant studies on the biological effects of electromagnetic
fields (EMF). They proposed that a precautionary approach be adopted
until more robust scientific information becomes available. In a
previous study, the authors demonstrated that exposure to EMF during
sleep reduced waking after sleep onset and affected the EEG in non-rapid
eye movement (non-REM) sleep.
In this present
study, the authors investigated the effect of exposure to pulsed
high-frequency EMF during waking on subsequent sleep. Fields similar
to those emitted by mobile communications equipment of GSM type
(global system for mobile communication) were applied. To simulate
the real-life exposure conditions, the subjects were exposed on
either side of the head. The EMF was directed to either the right
or left side of the head for 30 min. The subsequent sleep episode
was analyzed. As in a previous study, in which mechanical stimulation
of the right hand had been shown to induce unilateral changes in
the sleep EEG, the authors anticipated hemispheric differences.
Exposure to EMF
affected neither the sleep stages, nor were significant effects
of EMF exposure observed for subjective assessment of waking after
sleep onset, sleep latency, and sleep quality.
The main effect
of EMF exposure was the enhancement of the intensity of the brain's
electrical signals (EEG power density) in the frequency range of
9.750 - 11.25 Hz and in the 12.25 - 13.25 Hz in the first 30 minutes
of non-REM sleep. This effect was also present when the left and
right exposure were analyzed separately. The two sides of the brain
were similarly affected after left and right exposure. A comparison
within individuals showed that the spectral spindle peak frequency
in the 10 - 15 Hz range was not shifted by left and right exposure.
The REM sleep spectrum was not significantly affected.
In this study
the authors have shown for the first time that exposure to EMF during
waking affects the EEG during subsequent sleep. In the authors'
previous study, the EMF was directed towards the top of the head
to expose both sides of the brain. In the present experiment, the
field was aimed at one side or the other. Contrary to the authors'
expectation, the change in the brain's electrical signal intensity
was similar for both sides of the head.
The present results
lend support to previous reports on effects of EMF on physiological
and psychological variables. These include sleep and cognitive function
as well as blood pressure and heart rate. However, the present study
is unique in having confirmed previous results of an experiment
performed under similar conditions on the effect on sleep. The other
findings still need to be replicated or could not be reproduced.
This study demonstrates
that a short exposure to an electromagnetic field similar to those
emitted by mobile phones has an effect on brain physiology. Conclusions
about possible adverse effects on human health are premature because
the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Further studies are needed
to determine the time course of the changes, to specify field strength
- response relationships, and to define the critical field parameters
(e.g. modulation, frequency).
This paper and
accompanying In Focus article by a journal editor is for
a short period freely available on-line on this site. To obtain
a faxed pre-publication copy of this paper please contact:
Dr Phil J. Daly or Mr Ian Burgess
NeuroReport Editorial Office
Tel: +44-(0)20-7940-7500 (switchboard), -7521 (PJD), or -7518 (IB)
Fax: +44-(0)20-7940-7515
E-mail: pdaly@lww.co.uk
NOTE:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., is a leading international
publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses,
specialized clinicians and students. LWW provides essential information
for healthcare professionals in print and electronic formats, including
textbooks, journals, CD-ROM, and via Intranets and the Internet.
LWW is a unit of Wolters Kluwer International Health & Science,
a Philadelphia-based group of leading publishing companies offering
specialized publications and software in medicine, nursing, pharmacy,
science, and related areas. WKIHS also includes Ovid Technologies,
Inc., New York; Facts and Comparisons, St. Louis; Kluwer Academic
Publishers, The Netherlands; and Adis International, Auckland, NZ.
|